Home » Social Media, Social Media Marketing

Social Media in Verlagen und Social Media Guidelines

22 January 2009 3 Kommentare

Nicht ganz frisch, dafür umso spannender finde ich folgende Liste über die Social Media Aktivitäten bei Verlagen in Deutschland.

Wozu brauche ich die Liste? Wenn jemand im Unternehmen den Einsatz von Social Media und Social Media Marketing rechtfertigen muss. Wenn jemand Social Media im Unternehmen einführen möchte, oder Grundlagen/Case-Studies für eine Diplomarbeit über Social Medias sucht. Und natürlich wer wissen möchte, wo sich Online Meinungsführer aufhalten :)

Zu den Inhalten der Liste:

Twitter ist nicht alles ;) , und schon gar nicht viel. Wiki, Blog, Forum, Community, Online-Videos, Foto-Sharing, Social Networks und Widgets sind wohl die Social Media Bestandteile, die nicht in 2 Minuten aus dem Boden gestampft (getwittert) sind.

Der Mehrwert einzelner Aktionen muss hier wohl auch nicht besprochen werden. Obwohl ich Twitter nicht seine Netzwerkfähigkeiten sowie PR/Marketing/ und Kurzweilfähigkeiten abspreche – in Sachen Social Networking hat das Tool ja wirklich auch seine Stärken.

Allerdings müsste man die Theorie der Social Networks erweitern um die Kategorie “Freunde, die ich nicht wirklich kenne”. Bisher wird ja zwischen “tight” und “loose” Friends unterschieden. Mit Twitter kommt am unteren Ende nun noch “random” dazu. Jeder der möchte darf diese Idee aufgreifen und weiterverarbeiten, muss mich allerdings als Quelle angeben :) . Danah Boyd würde sich freuen.

Von Abendzeitung bis Zeit: Die Verlage, Verlagsgruppen und Tochterfirmen machen was. Momentan sind 204 Social Media Aktivitäten in dieser Liste festgehalten – seit wann wirklich an der jeweiligen Social Media Aktivität gearbeitet wird, steht leider nicht dabei.

Einige der Aktionen dienen sicher auch dem sog. Social Media Marketing. Spätestens wenn ein Verlag es jedoch übertrieben hat werden Sie merken, dass User nicht einfach zu steuern sind und immer mündiger werden. Das Pull-Medium ist da.

Am Rande: Social Media Guidelines. Bevor man anfängt schwer rumzubloggen, twittern etc. sollte man doch vielleicht Guidlines für seine Social Media Aktivitäten erstellen. Wer´s noch nicht hat – Intel hat es gemacht und die gibt´s hier zu lesen.

Übrigens: Auch für Leute die noch einen Blog im Unternehmen noch durchsetzen wollen oder Grundlegen und Engagement festlegen müssen ist der Social Media Guide von Intel lesenswert.

Für Redaktionen: Den folgenden Auszug habe ich auf mediummagazin gefunden. Die Authorin Nicole Simon und dadurch nach Aussagen anderer “Social Media Expertin” meint auf die Frage, ob Redaktionen twittern müssten:

“Nein, das Phänomen wird bleiben. Menschen wollen sich unmittelbar mitteilen und Twitter erfüllt dieses Bedürfnis auf ganz einfache Weise. Selbst wenn das Unternehmen hinter Twitter von heute auf morgen pleite geht, dann werden andere sofort an dessen Stelle treten. Jetzt haben Redaktionen noch die Zeit, mit dem Medium zu spielen … Irgendwann aber nicht mehr, weil dann alle anderen schon da sind. Wenn eine Redaktion heute noch nicht twittern möchte, sollte sie zumindest schon mal ihre Claims abstecken und ein Account unter ihrem Namen reservieren. Und dann sollte die Redaktion zunächst in einer geschlossenen Gruppe üben. …”

Ob man jetzt noch spielen sollte halte ich für fraglich. Das einiges auch über Twitter schief gehen kann haben wir ja schon gesehen, also kein Öl ins Feuer hier an dieser Stelle.

Weitere spannende SEO und Social Media Artikel:

3 Kommentare »

  • 10 dumme Fehler im Social Media said:

    [...] 5. Akzeptiere Freunde, die du eigentlich nicht kennst (siehe hier für “Random Friends” in Social networks) [...]

  • Marketing-Mark said:

    Hallo,

    der Link zu den Intel – Social Media Guidelines führt zu einer “Page not found” Meldung. Via Google finde ich die Guidelines nicht. Kann mir jemand helfen? Link? Email? Ich würde mich sehr freuen.

  • Norman (author) said:

    im cache habe ich folgendes gefunden, scheinbar hat intel die seite entfernt/verlagert:

    Intel Social Media Guidelines

    These are the official guidelines for social media at Intel. If you’re an Intel employee or contractor creating or contributing to blogs, wikis, social networks, virtual worlds, or any other kind of social media both on and off intel.com—these guidelines are for you. We expect all who participate in social media on behalf of Intel to be trained, to understand and to follow these guidelines. Failure to do so could put your future participation at risk. Failure to do so puts your participation at risk. These guidelines will continually evolve as new technologies and social networking tools emerge—so check back once in awhile to make sure you’re up to date.
    When You Engage

    Emerging platforms for online collaboration are fundamentally changing the way we work, offering new ways to engage with customers, colleagues, and the world at large. It’s a new model for interaction and we believe social computing can help you to build stronger, more successful business relationships. And it’s a way for you to take part in global conversations related to the work we are doing at Intel and the things we care about.

    The choice to participate in social media is yours. If you do, please follow these guiding principles:

    * Provide unique, individual perspectives on what’s going on at Intel and in the world.
    * Post meaningful, respectful comments – in other words, no spam and no remarks that are off-topic or offensive.
    * Reply to comments quickly, when a response is appropriate.
    * Respect proprietary information and confidentiality.
    * When disagreeing with others’ opinions, keep it cool.
    * Know and follow the Intel Code of ConductFiletype/Size: PDF 596KB and the Intel Privacy Policy

    back to top
    Rules of Engagement

    Be transparent. Your honesty—or dishonesty—will be quickly noticed in the social media environment. If you are blogging about your work at Intel, use your real name, identify that you work for Intel, and be clear about your role. If you have a vested interest in something you are discussing, be the first to point it out.

    Be judicious. Make sure your efforts to be transparent don’t violate Intel’s privacy, confidentiality and legal guidelines for external commercial speech. Ask permission to publish or report on conversations that are meant to be private or internal to Intel. All statements must be true and not misleading and all claims must be substantiated and approved. Product benchmarks must be approved for external posting by the appropriate product benchmarking team. Also be smart about protecting yourself, your privacy and Intel Confidential information. What you publish will be around for a long time, so consider the content carefully and be judicious.

    Write what you know. Ensure you write and post about your areas of expertise, especially as it relates to Intel and our technology. And write it in the first person. If you publish to a website outside Intel, please use a disclaimer something like this: “The postings on this site are my own and don’t necessarily represent Intel’s positions, strategies or opinions.” Also, please respect brand, trademark, copyright, fair use, confidentiality and financial disclosure laws—if you have any questions about these, see your Intel legal representative. Remember, you are personally responsible for your content.

    Perception is reality. In online social networks, the lines between public and private, personal and professional are blurred. Just by identifying yourself as an Intel employee, you are creating perceptions about Intel by our shareholders, customers, and the general public—and perceptions about you by your colleagues and managers. Do us all proud. Be sure that all content associated with you is consistent with your work and with Intel’s values and professional standards.

    It’s a conversation. Talk to your readers like you would talk to real people in professional situations. In other words, avoid overly pedantic or “composed” language. Don’t be afraid to bring in your own personality and say what’s on your mind. Consider content that’s open-ended and invites response. Encourage comments. You can also broaden the conversation by citing others who are blogging about the same topic and allowing your content to be shared or syndicated.

    Are you adding value? There are millions of words out there. The best way to get yours read is to write stuff people will value. Social communication from Intel should help our customers, partners, and co-workers. It should be thought-provoking and build a sense of community. If it helps people improve knowledge or skills; build their businesses; do their jobs; solve problems; or understand Intel better—then it’s adding value.

    Your Responsibility: What you write is ultimately your responsibility. Participation in social computing on behalf of Intel is not a right and it therefore needs to be taken seriously and with respect. Know and follow the Intel Code of ConductFiletype/Size: PDF 596KB. Failure to abide by these guidelines and the Intel Code of Conduct could put your participation at risk. Training is available for Intel employees to grow in this area, please contact social.media@intel.com for more information. For 3rd party sites, please also follow the terms and conditions of that site.

    Create some excitement. As a business and as a corporate citizen, Intel is making important contributions to the world, to the future of technology, and to public dialogue on a broad range of issues. Our business activities are increasingly focused on high-value innovation. Let’s share with the world the exciting things we’re learning and doing—and open up the channels to learn from others.

    Be a Leader. There can be a fine line between healthy debate and incendiary reaction. Do not denigrate our competitors or Intel. Try to frame what you write to invite differing points of view without inflaming others. Some topics—like politics or religion—slide more easily into sensitive territory. So be careful and considerate. Once the words are out there, you can’t really get them back. And once an inflammatory discussion gets going, it’s hard to stop.

    Did you screw up? If you make a mistake, admit it. Be upfront and be quick with your correction. If you’re posting to a blog, you may choose to modify an earlier post—just make it clear that you have done so.

    If it gives you pause, pause. If you’re about to publish something that makes you even the slightest bit uncomfortable, don’t shrug it off and hit ’send.’ Take a minute to review these guidelines and try to figure out what’s bothering you, then fix it. If you’re still unsure, you might want to discuss it with your manager or legal representative. Ultimately, the decision about what you publish is yours—as is the responsibility. So be sure.

    Moderation. Moderation is the act of reviewing and approving content before the content is published on the site. Intel does not endorse or take responsibility for content posted by 3rd parties. It is preferred that all content be posted by registered users of a site in accordance with an accepted terms and conditions and a code of conduct.

    Intel Content: We do not moderate content we publish. This means we allow for our blog authors to post directly without approval, as long as they have taken the legal training.

    Anonymous Content: Anonymous content is defined as content submitted as a comment, reply or post to an Intel site where the user has not registered and is not logged into the site. For anonymous content we require moderation on all submissions. Authors of the originating content and space moderators are required to review the content for approval or deletion before the content can be published.

    Registered Content: Registered content is content submitted as a comment, reply or post to an Intel site where the user has registered and is logged into the site. For registered content we do not require moderation of content before the content is published to the site. Registered content is directly published and content is moderated post publishing.

    back to top
    Moderation Guidelines

    Intel strives for a balanced online dialogue. When we do moderate content, we moderate using three guiding principles.

    The Good, the Bad, but not the Ugly. If the content is positive or negative and in context to the conversation then we approve the content, regardless if the content is favorable or unfavorable to Intel. However if the content is ugly, offensive, denigrating and completely out of context then we reject the content.

    Last updated: January 2009

Deine Meinung!

Verfasse einen Kommentar, oder einen trackback von deiner eigenen Seite. Du kannst auch die Kommentare verfolgen via RSS.